Speaking at the company's headquarters, Sudha Raghavan is direct about the starting point. "Fifteen years ago we were a domestic supplier with a good reputation and no global brand," the chief executive says. "We sold on price, we got squeezed, and we realised that if we did not move up the value chain we would not exist in a decade."
Talent is the recurring theme. The company runs a graduate programme that rotates new hires through manufacturing, quality and customer support, and Sudha Raghavan sits in on the final interview for every senior engineering role. "Capital is available. Judgement is scarce," the CEO says. "We hire for the second and buy the first."
From domestic supplier to global brand
Technology is the next frontier. The company has begun deploying machine vision on three production lines and plans to extend predictive maintenance to all plants within two years. Sudha Raghavan is wary of hype, but points to early data showing 9.1% lower rework costs. "Show me the yield, not the demo," the CEO says.
On sustainability, Sudha Raghavan says customer pressure is real. Two of the company's top five buyers now include emissions data in their scorecards. "Five years ago it was a footnote. Today it is a line item in the tender," the CEO says, adding that the firm has committed to renewable electricity at its main sites by 2028.
By the numbers
The conversation turns to failures. A joint venture in Germany was wound up after two years when the partners disagreed over quality standards. "We lost $217 million and learned that you cannot share a brand with someone who does not share your inspection regime," Sudha Raghavan says. "Culture beats contract."
“Global is not a launch. It is a habit you build one customer at a time.”
Talent and capital allocation
The results are visible. Export revenue now represents 15.8% of the total, the company serves customers in 1,051 countries, and its operating margin has widened by roughly 9.1% over the period. Sudha Raghavan credits patience: "Every one of these markets took us three to four years to crack. Boards that want results in four quarters should not enter."
Source: IGEN Intelligence analysis of central board of indirect taxes & customs data. Illustrative mock data.
On capital allocation, Sudha Raghavan describes a rule of thumb used by the board: no project is approved unless it can be funded from internal accruals in a downside case. "It means we sometimes say no to exciting things," Sudha Raghavan admits, "but it also means we have never had to dilute our own people to survive a bad year."
| Milestone | Year | Investment | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Certification push | Year 2 | $217 million | Qualified with 5 buyers |
| Office in Australia | Year 4 | $32 million | Local team of 40 |
| Margin discipline | Year 6 | n/a | Exited 8.6% of revenue |
| Graduate programme | Year 7 | $6 million | 120 hires |
| Machine vision | Year 12 | $11 million | 3 lines live |
Failures, policy and technology
Succession planning also receives attention. Sudha Raghavan has publicly named a successor development track and says three internal candidates are in line. "A company that depends on one person is a hobby," the CEO says, smiling. "We are building an institution that should not need me."
Timeline of key events
- Pivot decision
Leadership resolves to move up the value chain after margin squeeze.
- Certification investment
$217 million spent on testing and approvals ahead of demand.
- First overseas office
Sales and service team established in Australia.
- JV wound up
Partnership in Germany ends over quality-standards disagreement.
- Machine vision rollout
Deployed on three lines; extension to all plants planned.
That realisation triggered a sequence of decisions. The first was to invest in certification and testing ahead of demand, a bet that cost $217 million before it earned a rupee. The second was to open a sales and service office in Australia, staffed with local engineers. The third was to walk away from 8.6% of revenue that did not meet margin thresholds.
Expert commentary
“If the rules change every budget, long-term investment looks like gambling.”
“Smaller firms are not at a disadvantage on quality; they are at a disadvantage on paperwork and finance.”
“Firms that treat this as a compliance exercise will keep up. Firms that treat it as a design problem will pull ahead.”
Advice for the next generation
Asked about the policy environment, the CEO is pragmatic. Incentive schemes help, but Sudha Raghavan argues the bigger lever is predictability: stable duty structures, faster customs clearance and a reliable power supply. "If the rules change every budget, long-term investment looks like gambling."
What it means for you
Choose one market, hire locally and measure patience in years; walk away from revenue that erodes margin.
Look for boards with explicit downside-case funding rules and a visible succession track.
Predictable duty and power regimes matter more to long-term investors than headline incentives.
Rotational programmes and judgement-led hiring signal where leadership pipelines are being built.
Companies and leaders in this story
Frequently asked questions
Sources
- Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs: Port-level clearance and dwell data
- Port authority statistics: Container volumes, dwell times and berth productivity
- Directorate General of Foreign Trade: Export-import policy and public notices
- UN Comtrade: Bilateral trade flows by HS code
Mock content for demonstration. Names, figures and quotes are illustrative and not real reporting.