The Ministry of Electronics & IT published the revised framework for AI late on Tuesday, replacing guidelines that had been in force since 2021. The notification runs to 46 pages and touches eligibility thresholds, certification, the incentive claim cycle and the penalty schedule, and it takes effect 45 days after gazette publication.

Analysts note that the penalty structure is also sharper. Misdeclaration of local content can now trigger clawback of up to three years of incentives with interest, and repeat offenders face debarment from future schemes. Several consultancies reported a surge in inbound requests for pre-audit support within hours of the notification.

What the notification changes

Industry reaction has been measured. A trade body representing 345 member units welcomed the faster approvals but warned that small manufacturers lack the testing capacity to meet the new certification norms before Q2 FY27. It has asked for a 90-day grace period and a shared-laboratory scheme to be notified alongside the rule.

Legal advisers recommend that firms treat the first 45 days as a mapping exercise: classify every product line against the new definition, identify supplier gaps, and file for provisional certification early. Those who wait for the final operating manual, they warn, may find the first incentive window closing without them.

State governments are expected to follow with complementary measures. Three states have already signalled land and power-tariff concessions for AI clusters that meet the new thresholds, creating what one official called a competition for compliant capacity. The ministry will convene a coordination meeting next month to avoid duplicative incentives.

“The per-line local-content test is fair in principle and brutal in practice for diversified manufacturers.”

Who gains and who is exposed

For exporters the more immediate issue is documentation. Shipments to Australia and Netherlands will need a revised conformity declaration, and customs at Kolkata has begun piloting the electronic format. Forwarders report that mismatches between the old and new templates caused holds on roughly 7.3% of test consignments in the first fortnight.

The fiscal arithmetic is modest relative to the sector's size. AI contributed an estimated $7.8 billion to exports last year, and the ministry projects that full uptake of the scheme could lift that figure by 7.3% annually by 2028. Independent economists consider the target ambitious but not unreasonable if the certification bottleneck is resolved.

The compliance clock

At the centre of the change is a tighter definition of domestic value addition. Units will now need to demonstrate at least 5.6% local content on a product-line basis rather than a plant-wide average, a shift that officials say closes a loophole but that compliance teams describe as the single most expensive part of the rule.

Buyers abroad are watching closely. Procurement teams in Australia have asked their Indian suppliers for written confirmation of compliance timelines, and two large importers have reportedly paused new multi-year contracts until the first batch of certificates is issued. That pause, if it lengthens, is the main downside risk to the scheme's export goals.

What to watch next

Infosys, one of the larger beneficiaries of the previous scheme, said it expects to qualify under the new rules without changes to its sourcing but flagged a one-time cost of about $164 million to re-certify two legacy lines. The company noted that the longer-term benefit lies in predictability, because incentive rates are now fixed through 2028.